<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Peace Not Apartheid?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://consblog.org/index.php" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://consblog.org/index.php/2009/01/30/peace-not-apartheid/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 11:20:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://consblog.org/index.php/2009/01/30/peace-not-apartheid/comment-page-1/#comment-7187</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://consblog.org/?p=554#comment-7187</guid>
		<description>Professor Smout also has this view: &quot;If one species can successfully interbreed with another, it might assist its survival in evolutionary terms. If it is a failure, the hybrid will die out.&quot; Now who&#039;s the Nazi? That&#039;s biological social Darwinism.

Anyway, more directly: when he says, &quot;&quot;The preoccupation with alien species is comparatively recent and not something which worried scientists and ecologists 50 years ago,&quot; he displays stunning lack of insight into environmental history for someone about to publish a book called &quot;Exploring Environmental History.&quot;) Other things that people weren&#039;t really worried about 50 years ago: internet addiction, cellphone brain cancer, Sarah Palin. 

I think there&#039;s an interesting debate to be had about the ethics of culling exotic populations to preserve native ones, but this guy should not be the spokesperson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Professor Smout also has this view: &#8220;If one species can successfully interbreed with another, it might assist its survival in evolutionary terms. If it is a failure, the hybrid will die out.&#8221; Now who&#8217;s the Nazi? That&#8217;s biological social Darwinism.</p>
<p>Anyway, more directly: when he says, &#8220;&#8221;The preoccupation with alien species is comparatively recent and not something which worried scientists and ecologists 50 years ago,&#8221; he displays stunning lack of insight into environmental history for someone about to publish a book called &#8220;Exploring Environmental History.&#8221;) Other things that people weren&#8217;t really worried about 50 years ago: internet addiction, cellphone brain cancer, Sarah Palin. </p>
<p>I think there&#8217;s an interesting debate to be had about the ethics of culling exotic populations to preserve native ones, but this guy should not be the spokesperson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

